My Nonprofit Reviews
Review for The Parent-Child Home Program, Mineola, NY, USA
Some years ago a friend recommended that I learn about Parent Child Home Program and told me the founder had written a book about the research that went into creating the model: "Messages from Home," (2nd ed. 2008).
I read it and was impressed with the careful development of this straightforward program in which a "home visitor" visits a parent and child twice weekly for 26 weeks for two years. The child is about 2 at the start.
To each half-hour visit, the visitor brings a book or a toy and reads and plays with the child, inviting the parent to participate as much or as little as she or he wants. Some parents just watch for several weeks; others jump right in. The bottom line is that the child AND the parent start to understand that learning is fun. The child grows; the parent grows. Some parents are introduced for the first time to basic communication and interpersonal skills by the visiting experience.
So I went to a conference several years ago, followed the program, read some more, spoke with people involved. And I was hooked. How could I, a solid middle-class baby boomer, not love a program that does so much for little kids who have nothing to start with--and for so little money?!
The payoff to "society" is very great down the line as well. Kids who had no chance to succeed graduate from high school at the same rate as their socioeconomically advantaged counterparts.
This probably sounds strange, but with Parent Child Home Program (PCHP), I think of the scene in the movie The Miracle Worker, where Annie Sullivan pours water on Helen Keller's little hand, and Helen remembers vaguely a word she knew before she totally lost her hearing and sight. "Wah-wah," she says. "Water." Real learning. And after that nothing stopped Helen Keller from growing. She called Annie Sullivan "Teacher." And PCHP reminds parents that they are their children's first teachers.
If I had to make changes to this organization, I would...
Because the model is unique, the process of becoming a sponsor of a site program needs to be made more transparent. It also should leverage the excellent press it gets.
Was your donation impactful?
How likely is it that you would recommend that a friend donate to this group?
How likely are you to donate to this group again?
When was your last experience with this nonprofit?