My Nonprofit Reviews
Review for New York Public Radio, New York, NY, USA
Last year I reported that WNYC had violated its charter by refusing to report about crucial issues of public concern, including the scourge of public corruption in New York's legal system.
It is evident that WNYC's policy is influenced by members of their Board of Trustees associated with law firms who benefit from this corruption.
WNYC has many entertaining and informative programs, but the censorship of this one critical issue undermines their credibility and their validity.
One tragic consequence of this policy was the murder of Mr. Sunny Sheu, an activist against judicial corruption. Mr. Sheu (and others) begged WNYC to report the kidnapping and death threats against him by NYPD police at the behest of a powerful NY Supreme Court Judge.
When WNYC refused to interview Mr. Sheu, he posted a video on Youtube describing the threats against his life.
Six weeks later, Mr. Sheu was found dead of massive head trauma on a deserted street in Queens, NY. A documented cover-up of the incident has been orchestrated by the NYPD and FBI.
WNYC has refused to cover the death or the cover up and continues to ignore one of the greatest threats to the public it is chartered to serve.
My efforts to communicate with WNYC about the issue of judicial corruption have been met with hostility and vilification of me and my colleagues. There is clearly a strong incentive in the upper management to avoid addressing the problem of judicial corruption.
I've personally experienced the results of this organization in...
If I had to make changes to this organization, I would...
In order to fulfill its charter, WNYC must be truly independent of interest who are threatened by truthful reporting.
Review for New York Public Radio, New York, NY, USA
WNYC Has some great programming and extraordinary hosts, but they are dangerously lacking independence. Specifically, they explicitly refuse to cover the dire issue of Judicial Corruption in New York State, and actively censor listener input regarding this matter. (Please read below for an explanation, or contact me for documentation.) This may be due to the fact that they are funded by some of the lawfirms that benefit from the corrupt status quo. The mother of Elliot Spitzer is also on the board of directors, which is a dangerous conflict of interest. My Story: I am a musician whose family has lived in Manhattan for four generations. I have been a performing guest on Lenny Lopaite’s show and a guest on Leanne Hansen’s Weekend Edition and a member of WNYC for decades. Nobody loves and cares about WNYC more than I do. Six years ago, a major law firm attempted to steal my copyrights to my own CD and I sued to protect my rights. Although I ultimately prevailed, I was shocked to discover that the New York State judiciary is unimaginably corrupt; from attorneys who break ethical rules to judges who break judicial law to the Chief Judge of New York State, Jonathan Lippman, who was illegally shoehorned into power by the corrupt New York State Senate, all with utter impunity and no media coverage. WNYC does terrific journalism and entertainment in many areas, but by their own admission, they will not touch the issue of judicial corruption (see below). Apparently, they are improperly beholden to their primary benefactors, which include many of the “White Shoe” law firms. As shown below, the interests of these firms are in conflict with the interests of the Public and of honest journalism, and have lead WNYC to self-censor reporting on matters crucial to their listeners. Brian Lehrer is a star among stars: brilliant, informed, witty, human and consciencous. I can only pray that the reason he has neglected to respond to my concerns is that he has been sequestered from my correspondence. This letter is an effort to assure that he knows what is being said done in his name. New York State’s Utter Lack of Judicial Oversight Attorney and Judicial rules and laws are enforced by the so-called "judicial oversight committees" specifically the divisional "Grievance Committees" and the "Commission on Judicial Conduct" (CJC). The corruption in both of these bodies is absolute and flagrant. Complaints against lawyers with "connections" are brazenly whitewashed. Lawyers who act against the connected ones are often sanctioned or disbarred Likewise, the CJC dismisses complaints against judges without any investigation or explanation. Judges who dare to challenge the system are punished. To compound the problem, no attorney will touch cases of alleged corruption against crooked attorneys or judges. They know this means professional suicide. The Public Resistance There exists an affiliation of victims of judicial corruption, and consequently of the Grievance Committees and/or the CJC. Our complaints against these agencies are not about unfavorable decisions, but about the flagrant lack of due process. We have at least seven cases now pending in federal court, specifically against the grievance committees and the CJC with more being prepared. Members of this affiliation have been fighting this corruption by compiling evidence proving flagrant abuses by judges and lawyers and the pattern of blatant corruption in the oversight committees. These include: - Christine Anderson Esq: a six year veteran investigating attorney at the First Departmental Disciplinary Committee,: who was fired by Jonathan Lippman for whistle-bowing against systemic corruption at the DDC. - The Honorable Duane Hart: an exemplary sitting Supreme Court Judge, who has suffered a campaign of harassment and retaliation by the CJC for standing by his principals. His Honor has stated on the record that the only lawyer he has known who is “sleazier” than the Chairman of the CJC is the Chief Counsel of the DDC. - Gizella Weishauss: A survivor of Auschwitz, and the first complainant in the Holocaust restitution case against the Swiss banks. Removed from the case by her lawyer after she exposed graft and corruption by her lawyers, she was deprived of the restitution she sought for all victims. The New York DDC whitewashed her complaints against her lawyer even as he was disbarred in its counterpart in New Jersey. -Louisa Esposito, a car accident victim who videotaped her lawyer Allen Isaac demanding oral sex in return for a “favorable outcome” based on his connections with the judges of the First Appellate Division Court. -Numerous attorneys who have been disbarred, sanctioned and harassed for obeying their obligations to their clients and the rules of professional responsibility. The June 8th Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing On June 8th 2009, after years of pressure from concerned citizens, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing in Albany about the alleged abuses by the oversight committees. Most of the above victims testified at the hearing, which can be viewed in its entirety on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28afajRkDwY&feature=channel The illegal confirmation of Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman. Jonathan Lippman is one of the worst perpetrators of judicial corruption in New York, and his ascension to the highest judgeship in New York State is a disaster for justice. There are at least seven federal corruption cases pending against Lippman in the Southern District and dozens more before the SJC and CJC. On January 29th, 2009 Hearings were held to discuss the process for the section of nominees for Chief Judge. WNYC refused to announce this public hearing despite written requests well in advance. The February 11th, 2009, Confirmation hearings were the only opportunity for the public to voice concerns about Judge Lippman. WNYC refused to announce this hearing and refused to cover the hearing, As a result, only I and two other New Yorkers in opposition attended the hearing, after learning of the hearing from a leak. In contrast, over one hundred friends and family of Lippman were personally invited to celebrate his confirmation. It was only after I alerted WNYC that Wayne Barrett had a front page story in the Village Voice about Lipman’s corruption, did Brian interview Barrett- briefly, after the fact., with no questions of substance, On June 8th 2009, hearings were held before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding abuses by the judicial oversight committees. 200 citizens attended. But WNYC refused to announce or cover this historic hearing. By its own admission, WNYC “will not cover” the matter of judicial corruption in New York State. Over the past three years I have repeatedly requested that WNYC dedicate one single segment to the hugely important issue of judicial corruption in New York State, and specifically about the corrupt oversight committees. Over the past five years at least, there has not been a single segment on this subject. I was told by newsroom that there was “no time to cover every story that listeners request”. As I was speaking to the newsroom rep, Brian Lehrer was hosting a thirty-minute segment on handbag fashions. No time? When I persisted in requesting coverage of the judiciary, I was sent a threatening letter by WNYC’s counsel Ivan Zimmerman, who warned me to desist in my requests (letter available on request). I was told by Beth Fertig that she had been told not to speak to me because I was “harassing the station”, but Ms. Fertig refused to tell me who told her that, or what that allegation was based upon. Most ominously, in a recorded conversation on June 15th 2009, “Sarah” at WNYC’s Listener Services stated that WNYC “will not cover” the topic of judicial corruption, before hanging up on me. (Mp3 recording available on request) WNYC has censored its website to conceal listener concern about Judicial Corruption. The minutes of the Community Advisory Board meeting of January 20, 2009, on the WNYC website report: “CAB board member Ken Stewart said that Mr. Galison had recently convinced him of his case, and asked Mr. Galison what WNYC could do.” However, the minutes of the prior CAB meeting at which I presented my “case” were censored to expunge any mention of my original suggestion that WNYC address judicial corruption, a suggestion Mr. Stewart initially questioned. WNYC has reportedly threatened to have me arrested for criticizing their negligence of Judicial corruption. An anonymous threat on the website http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/ states: “my friend [at WNYC] tells me they have a picture of him hanging up near the entrance and direction to call the police if he shows up there again. Scary. Tightly wound, ready to break. Watch out. Why would WNYC neglect this crucial topic? The connections between WNYC’s board of directors and the “White Shoe” law firms are vast and will be the subject of a report to be sent to published on the internet in the near future. These law firms are the clear beneficiaries of the corruption that pervades the Judiciary and they are deeply invested in preserving the status quo. For more information on New York State Judicial Corruption, see: http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/ www.judgewatch.org I can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
If I had to make changes to this organization, I would...
Disengage my editorial policy from the demands of corporate sponsors. I would put integrity and the public good above all considerations of funding. I would move back to Center street before selling my station's soul to corrupt interest
What I've enjoyed the most about my experience with this nonprofit is...
great programming, no commercials
The kinds of staff and volunteers that I met were...
The Listener services representative Sarah was snide, insulting, rude and utterly unhelpful. She told me that WNYC would not cover the issue of judicial corruption but that she did not know why. She refused to let me speak with any other representative.
If this organization had 10 million bucks, it could...
...Either waste more money on extravagant facilities, or wean itself off the funding from corporations who demand censorship of vital public issues.
Ways to make it better...
I had not been treated disrespectfully and had my respectful and accurate letters and comments censored. Had I not been threatened and libeled for supplying respectful accurate documentation of corruption.
In my opinion, the biggest challenges facing this organization are...
Gaining independence from dangerously corrupt interests.
One thing I'd also say is that...
WNYC sells itself as a paragon of integrity. They may have been at one time. They have gone down a very dark road by allowing their editors to be influenced by corrupt corporate sponsor. I urge anyone to contact me for more information and documentation
When was your last experience with this nonprofit?